Subject(s)
Convalescence , Cough/epidemiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Dietary Supplements/statistics & numerical data , Eating , Fever/epidemiology , Health Status , Humans , Infant , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Lipids/therapeutic use , Longitudinal Studies , Malawi/epidemiology , Malnutrition/prevention & control , Nutritional Status , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thinness/drug therapyABSTRACT
The study was a controlled, comparative clinical effectiveness trial of two supplementary feeding regimens in children at risk of malnutrition from seven centres in rural Malawi. Being at risk of malnutrition was defined as weight-for-height <85%, but >80% of the international standard. A stepped-wedge design with systematic allocation was used for assigning children to receive either ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) (n=331) or micronutrient-fortified corn/soy-blend (n=41) for up to eight weeks. The primary outcomes were recovery, defined as weight-for-height >90%, and the rate of weight gain. Children receiving RUTF were more likely to recover (58% vs 22%; difference 36%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 20-52) and had greater rates of weight gain (3.1 g/kg.d vs 1.4 g/kg x d; difference 1.7; 95% CI 0.8-2.6) than children receiving corn/soy-blend. The results of this preliminary work suggest that supplementary feeding with RUTF promotes better growth in children at risk of malnutrition than the standard fortified cereal/legume-blended food.